PUBLIC NOTE
  • HOME
  • Published Editions
  • how to PUBLISH
  • About
    • Meet the Team
  • Contact
    • Joining Public Note

Exploring Explanations of Conflict-Related Sexual Violence against Men
- Amara Boumann -

Abstract

​
Recently, conflict-related sexual violence (CRSV) has been recognized as a major global security issue. In most of the existing literature CRSV has been separated into two categories: 1) opportunistic and 2) strategic and systematic. Critical feminists have argued that we should step away from this binary framing of the problem, but research on CRSV against men has hardly been included in the literature. The dynamics of CRSV against men are complex, but until now the problem has mostly been framed as strategic/systematic. In this paper, I will study how CRSV against men fits within the strategic and opportunistic frames of CRSV. I found that male-directed CRSV can be both strategic and opportunistic. Besides this, I found explanations that go beyond these binary framing and therefore to move away from heteronormative binary grids of CRSV against men. By identifying these explanations, this study contributes new insights to the ongoing debate on male-directed CRSV.

Evidence for Practice

  • Conflict-related sexual violence is mostly framed as either the ‘sexed story’ (opportunistic) or the ‘gendered story’ (strategic). These heteronormative, binary framings are disproportionally negative against non-females, including men, and reduce sexual violence to merely an instrumental by-product of war.
  • Strategic sexual violence is seen as the sole explanation for conflict-related sexual violence against men, completely disregarding the possibility of sex and sexual pleasure.  This dominant framing limits the possibility to understand the complex dynamics of conflict-related sexual violence against men. 
  • I present stories of sexually violated men that are inconsistent with the dominant framing of conflict-related sexual violence against men and show that sexual violence can be about strategy, opportunism, pleasure and power.

Keywords: Conflict-related sexual violence (CRSV), male victims, strategy-opportunity paradigm, sex, pleasure, power

Citation: Boumann, A. (2022). Exploring explanations of conflict-related sexual violence against men. Public Note, 10(1), 25-33.

A, Boumann (2022).pdf
File Size: 365 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File

Picture

About the author
​
"Amara Boumann is a Political Science student at the University of Amsterdam. The only thing (academically speaking) she loves more than writing, reading, and debating about politics, feminism and (in)equality, is adding words to sentences that are already too long and exceeding every word limit she gets. She is an aspiring journalist and hopes to complement her bachelor’s degree with masters in Political Communication and in Journalism and Media".

SUPPORTED BY:

Foto
Foto
  • HOME
  • Published Editions
  • how to PUBLISH
  • About
    • Meet the Team
  • Contact
    • Joining Public Note